EO Wilson calls it the Great Epic of Evolution. And it is quite an amazing story, greater than any creation myth. From matter to chemicals to biology to man. That is our Bible and our Homer.
Is scientific materialist atheism such an advance? It is "true". But is reducing man simply to his sexual biological impulses "progress"? Animals and brutes are also materialistic. They have no Gods or no mystical Platonic ideals hanging over them. They are pure egoists. They are rational in the sense that they attempt to use incomplete information to max pleasure and min pain. BF Skinner demonstrated that even pigeons can be made "superstitious" in that if knocking on wood always gets them food, they will knock on wood for good luck. But that is a scientific superstition. A miscalculation about cause and effect. In that sense the wrong ideas of history have been more important than the right ideas. There were materialists in the Greek world that superficially preceded all of our predictions in natural science. And yet it was the wrong idealistic theories that really mattered. Seeing what was not there. Believing that in some sense reality is not real. So should we really be so proud that all mystical veils have been set aside? What if that false man, against his biological human nature, was in some sense more human than real man? This takes the form first of art and religion. Both forms represent the human ideal symbolically. It is only with speculative philosophy that the truth represented in those symbols is at last stated explicitly. The only truly beautiful things this hellish universe have ever produced have stood against the grain of the brutality of nature and biology.
As a young boy I wrote a tribute to liberty. Of the three sisters liberty, equality and fraternity, I hold liberty first. What good is equality of slaves or fraternity in chains? Libertas the great pure Roman goddess. Can one imagine a Goddess of liberty? Among those degenerate, scheming, Olympians? Jupiter, Minerva, Venus, those lustful tricksters all bow before the virgin beauty of Liberty. God was saddened after he lost his most faithful lieutenant Satan to treason. And so he took the fallen wings of Lucifer, and crafted an infant babe. Down to the fires of Hell, God journeyed. And there was Lucifer. This marriage of heaven and hell. This daughter of God and Lucifer. This child who would redeem the Fall and reconcile Father and Son. God and Lucifer arm in arm. What do we call this child born of heaven and hell? A voice thunders down from the clouds. Call her Liberty!
And so we have seen the five stages of liberty. Each one beautiful and Godly in its own way, but with its dark satanic side. The great Protestant Reformation proclaiming soul liberty. The Dutch, English, American, French, 1848 Revolutions proclaiming political liberty. And in the footsteps of democracy, the market, capitalism- economic liberty. And now the unholy holy marriage of liberal third wave feminism and PUA game. Sexual liberty. And the walls of Jericho came tumbling down. The end of sexual feudalism. Is it really so bad?
Is not the triumph of the Alpha-mimicry over genuine alphaness a victory for liberty, market and democracy? Virgin at 50 complains at the loss of his sexual feudal status. As a business owner he is a genuine Alpha. Men in a hierarchy submit to his rule. Does that not entitle to him to sexual dominance? And yet he laments that the homeless man on the street has more sexual success than him. Would it be a better world where those with genuine societal dominance triumphed over the mimics?
This is the world you asked for. A world of liberty and freedom. Did you not say as boy that of the three sisters, you chose liberty. That was YOUR choice. Ah my American Paris what disaster you have brought upon your Troy. You saw only love and did not see the jealousy between the sister. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. To give the Golden Apple to one, would be to strike chaos among the others. You have made Equality and Fraternity the sworn enemies of Troy. And oh what a terrible vengeance they have struck. Your virgin bride Liberte has become the whore liberty! Who else is there to blame? In a historical sense, your just an insignificant atom. But in a cosmic metaphysical sense, your choices are directly responsible for the Brave New America. This is the freedom and democracy you asked for. If freedom wasn’t what you really wanted. If your secret goal was that everyone would freely chose X, than you ought to have chosen X. Stranger in a strange land. I have returned to the utopia I built. The freest people in history. That is your creation. The fruit of your virtue. IS it bitter?
"John Searle illustrates the evolution of social facts from brute facts by the constitutive rule: X counts as Y in C. "The Y terms has to assign a new status that the object does not already have just in virtue of satisfying the Y term; and there has to be collective agreement, or at least acceptance, both in the imposition of that status on the stuff referred to by the X term and about the function that goes with that status. Furthermore, because the physical features [brute facts] specified by the X term are insufficient by themselves to guarantee the fulfillment of the assigned function specified by the Y term, the new status and its attendant functions have to be the sort of things that can be constituted by collective agreement or acceptance."
The world says that it is X. It defines itself as X. You consider it X. You hate X and wish it were Y. But what can you do? There is nothing that words of either you or the world can do that can change X. Only actually changing X can change X. Suppose that X were defined as Y by the world, and vice versa. You genuinely hate X. Not the word X. So if that were the case, you would hate what Y represented and thus hate Y. And yet you are so Confucian about rectifying names. You think if only the world would call itself Y, even if it were genuinely X, all would be will. So you read some critics of Y, who say that X is really Y that calls itself X. But that doesn’t really help. So than you try to convince yourself through fuzzy logic that somehow in its real essence X is Y. But it strikes hollow. And the best case scenario would only convince you to hate Y. But you would still love genuine Y, you simply would no longer define it as Y. So you would in no way be reconciled to the world.
Many big corporations often hire world’s celebrities to represent for their products. In most case, it is a win-win situation. The celebrities will have the chance to get closer to the public. And the manufactures will have to chance to show their products to the celebrities’ fans. Howver, in some cases, this approach does not get the right results. It is because the manufactures have selected wrong images for their products. Followings are some examples:
Even though Paris Hilton is not an ambassador for Blackberry, but the Blackberry on her hands has made many fans of this smartphone get angry.
Nicole Ritchie has become famous because of her father, Lionel Ritchie. And she is a good friend of Paris Hilton. However, she has been less famous when representing for T-Mobile’s Sidekick. And of coruse, she has turned Sidekick to the negative ways as well. It is because Nicole has never been adored by teens.
The earphones (headphone) Skullcandy looks just so ugly when it comes along with the famous rapper, Snoop Dog.
The comedian, Jerry Seinfield, seems has nothing to do with the software giant – Microsoft, but he was chosen for an advertising for the company along with Bill Gates. However, the ads has been forgotten just after 1 month of launching. A big failure from Microsoft.
HP chose the famous rapper Jay-Z to represent for its computer in which Jay-Z used a HP’s computer to save music, photos, and appoinments files. However, no body could see his face on the ads. Many people though it was not Jay-Z in the poster.
In a drawn out collapse, the Liberty Movement is given a tremendous time advantage.
Winter is slowly melting away here in the U.S., and Spring will soon be upon us. Wall Street is currently flush with delight at the year long run of the stock market (driven by fiat bailouts), which at first glance appears to be doing quite well, though international incidences such as those in Dubai and Greece have revealed how shaky the market actually is in the face of any unhealthy news. In the meantime, the dollar, recently on the edge of detrimental value loss, has made a semi-miraculous recovery in the span of a few months, especially as the Euro suffers. Official employment numbers, despite the continuous loss of jobs monthly, have somehow fallen and are for the moment stabilized. Is it time for America to dust off the old credit cards and return to the wild and rollicking carefree spending days of pre-2007? Perhaps not…
While the mainstream media puts on the recovery song and dance, the fundamental problems of the collapse remain the same, and in some cases are growing ever more precarious. Subsections of the public, unaware of the real issues at hand, are holding a misguided jubilee in the tranquil eye of a hurricane, wrongly assuming that the storm has passed.
The world is breathing a hasty sigh of relief at the beginning of 2010, but what are the facts behind the current “peaceful” economic moment? In this article, we will examine whether or not the good news is legitimate, or, if are we being lulled into a false sense of security…
Job Market Statistics Manipulated
At the beginning of the year, official unemployment stood at around 10%. This number of course does not include those people who are off unemployment benefits and still have not found jobs, or those people who are underemployed. The Labor Department then announced their intention to revise their “birth/death ratio” method of calculating job loss, which would supposedly add a whopping 800,000 lost jobs to their books that were hidden before:
Directly after this news was released, markets braced for a substantial increase in the unemployment percentage. Yet, by some act of magic, the unemployment percentage fell to 9.7%!
How is this possible? Well, those of us who were hoping for greater Labor Department transparency (including myself) should have known better. With the Labor Department, two-plus-two NEVER equals four…
As the EPI article above indicates, while the government has reportedly changed their dubious “birth/death ratio” method, they also at the same time changed their “home survey” method. This survey is meant to give the Labor Department an overall view of unemployment percentages, but now the government has sharply reduced the number of households they actually survey, making the results more volatile and easier to manipulate. This why even though nearly a million jobless people were added to the unemployment rolls, the government was still able to report a drop in unemployment percentages. Sound like a dirty trick? Yes, it is…
According to the EPI’s estimates, which are probably still conservative, over 11 million jobs would need to be created in order to bring employment rates to pre-2007 levels. This is called the “jobs gap.” To fill the jobs gap by 2013 (which is about the time frame that the government has suggested it would take for a full recovery) the U.S. would need to generate over 400,000 jobs a month for the next three years! As I think most of you can see, this is not going to happen. Last month according to official numbers the U.S. lost another 36,000 jobs. Jobs are not being created, and will not be created anywhere near the 400,000 a month mark required for a three year recovery.
Also not often reported is the span of weeks at which those who are unemployed have to wait until they find another job. This “lag time” in-between jobs has grown markedly higher in recent months as the chart below shows:
In January of this year alone, 6.3 million people (over half of those unemployed) had been without a job for more than 6 months. This is an astonishing number, and it shows just how out of touch MSM reports of recovery are. Anyone who has been unemployed for more than just one month knows how tense and uncertain such a situation makes life. Imagine the misery of a 6 month hiatus from steady work, not able to fully support ones self and not knowing when you’ll be able to again. The Labor Department, nor the media, seems to take the factor of ‘duration’ into account when considering whether employment is actually in recovery. Nor do they take into account the fact that most of the jobs lost over the past two years were high paying and specialized, while most of the scant few jobs created have been low paying service sector positions.
What is most frightening about this information is that it reveals deliberate mishandling of statistics. Instead of being more open about unemployment numbers, the government is moving to hide them further. But why would they escalate secrecy on the economy?
The Day The Dollar Died
Last week, Li Ruogu, chairman of Export-Import Bank of China, a lender tasked with supporting the country’s foreign investments, stated that China would continue to support the dollar and that reports of a break from U.S. treasuries were “absolute nonsense.” Investors in treasuries this week seemed to take the comment as a good sign that the dollar’s place as world reserve currency is assured. However, one might ask why it was suddenly so important for China to comfort treasury markets?
Interestingly, statements of China’s “affection” for the dollar have come right after their central bank decided to dump $34 billion in U.S. treasuries. Along with other nations, the U.S. suffered the worst one month treasury dump on record so far at $53 billion:
This follows a treasury dump last year by China of $25 billion, after which we predicted that such dumps would occur more frequently and in larger amounts. Apparently, we were right:
Initially, it was reported after their latest dumping of U.S. bonds that China had lost its position as the number one investor in U.S. debt, placing Japan in the top spot. Strangely, only days later this report was rescinded after the Treasury released a statement claiming that China did indeed dump $34 billion in bonds, but, they were still the number one investor in T-bills:
How is this possible? According to the Treasury, they “forgot” to include Chinese treasury holdings in third markets such as Hong Kong and Britain. This is very strange. Who holds these extra bonds and what are they doing sitting in foreign venues? Is it not convenient that these bonds appeared from thin air just as news of China’s treasury dump was hitting the bond market? And now we suddenly have a Chinese finance official attempting to reassure the world that China still wants T-bonds while at the same time they are trying to get rid of them? If this behavior seems confusing it is because this is what occurs when governments lie big; no matter how good they are at it, they can’t make the facts add up.
If one examines Treasury Auctions month-to-month, they would find that “Primary Buyers” of treasuries (who have to buy treasuries when no one else is buying) now dominate auction sales. Indirect buyers, who cannot be tracked, also make up a large portion of competitive bids on treasury bonds. It is suspected that most of these indirect buys are made by the Federal Reserve itself in order to prop up the dollar. The article below explains the process succinctly:
The bottom line is that foreign governments are NOT buying treasuries at volumes necessary to keep the U.S. afloat amidst its ever climbing national debt, and in some cases, they are now trying to quietly and gradually dump what they have so as to not arouse immediate suspicion from the markets. In fact, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve seem to be helping them do this!
The dollar is, in effect, dead, but disinformation and market manipulation, mainly by the private Federal Reserve, is being used to reanimate it for appearances. The result is the conjuring of a kind of “zombie currency,” a Weekend at Bernie’s currency that the Fed props up with strings and pulleys to fool everyone at the party.
The most obvious question here is, why go through so much trouble to keep the dollar around at all?
World Government And The SDR
Since the “Great Recession” began, economic forums and conferences such as the G20, and the annual World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland have spoken of little else except the formation of a centralized world economy and the establishment of a legal body that has the power to run it. At the Davos “workshops,” economists and others present ideas for world governance as if they were the originators of the concept. It may not be surprising to most of us that there is rarely if ever anyone who participates in the WEF meetings that supports the restoration of national sovereignty. In fact, nearly all the participants seem to assume that a world government is the solution to all our ills. It is also important that like the G20, government officials from all over the world attend, including those from the U.S., and that very often the policies developed at these forums end up in legislation and mass media here at home. Meaning, the laws and propaganda supporting forced globalization and world government are fine tuned at the meetings and then brought to America for mass consumption. Below are a couple video examples of Davos workshops:
It is important to recognize what exactly is being presented in these two videos because they reveal much about our current economic circumstances. The goal of the G20 and the WEF, as they have stated on numerous occasions, is to dissolve national sovereignty. If they had their way, America as we know it would not exist, along with the Constitutional framework that is meant to protect our liberties. To achieve this end, a carefully engineered breakdown of the U.S. dollar is being enacted.
As we have shown, U.S. treasuries auctions have tanked and those long term treasuries already held by foreign nations are being slowly cast off. So far, the Federal Reserve has propped up the dollar by purchasing T-bonds in the place of foreign banks who no longer want them. By continually monetizing this debt, the Fed will inflate an incredible bubble in the treasury market. When will this bubble burst? The key lay in the rules governing Special Drawing Rights.
Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) are securities much like treasury bonds. Their value is determined by a basket of international currencies including the Dollar, the Euro, the Yen, and the Pound Sterling. The IMF claims that SDRs are not technically considered currency, but SDRs serve nearly all the functions of a currency except that they are not available to the general public (yet). It walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but the IMF would rather not call it a duck. In the end, the SDR is a world reserve currency, and its purpose is to topple the dollar.
Not long after the economic meltdown began, the IMF announced that they would begin the unlimited printing of SDRs. In 2009, within the span of a few months, SDR circulation went from $21 billion, to nearly $204 billion, and this is only the amount they have admitted to:
Governments across the world have purchased SDRs, while at the same time dropping U.S. treasuries. China in particular has shown sharp interest in the SDR as a replacement for the U.S. dollar:
It may be prudent to mention that China’s heightened dumping of U.S. treasuries began right around the time that the IMF began mass printing SDRs. And, even more disconcerting, the U.S. Treasury also quintupled its supply of SDRs in August of 2009:
Being that the U.S. dollar is supposedly the undisputed world reserve currency, why would the U.S. Treasury have any need to buy SDRs at all? Would this not be redundant? Unless, the Treasury knows that the dollar will not remain the world reserve currency for much longer….
Now we get to the tricky part…
The IMF has instituted new rules governing the SDR and those countries who trade it (called “member countries”). Drafting the “Fourth Amendment” governing SDR allocation, the IMF now requires member nations to retain a “special allocation” of the currency much higher than previous allocations. Countries who keep their SDR supply above the required level receive interest payment on their excess. Countries that fall below the required level have to PAY interest on the shortfall. That is to say, if the U.S. were to allow its SDR reserves to fall below the level demanded by the IMF, we would be punished monetarily. Also, under current rules, the interest rates of the currencies that make up the SDR help to determine the interest rates of the SDR.
The IMF claims it only acts as an “intermediary” between countries wishing to trade in SDRs, but since the IMF is the creator and printer of SDR’s, this would ultimately make them the controller of the SDR market, not some outside intermediary.
Participation in the SDR market for now is voluntary. However, what we are witnessing here is the subtle positioning of the SDR as the only alternative in the event that the U.S. dollar fails, and once again, China is the key.
China’s Slow Dollar Dive
The argument is constantly made by mainstream economists that China could never drop its large supply of U.S. T-bills because if they tried, the dollar would collapse, virtually erasing the value of their dollar holdings. The suggestion that “they are as dependent on us as we are on them” is rampant in the MSM, but, if we throw in the wild card factor of the SDR, this all changes.
If the Chinese central bank along with certain others amass enough SDRs over an extended period of time while gradually selling off their T-bonds, the SDR’s could act as a cushion to prevent foreign central banks from losing a large portion of their wealth while the dollar sinks. In fact, in the event that the Federal Reserve raises interest rates on the dollar (perhaps in response to the heightened risk of a mass treasury dump) those holding SDR’s actually benefit, because the interest they receive on their SDR reserves will also go up:
This would not absorb all of China’s losses in the event of a dollar collapse, but it would be a very effective stop gap, and ample incentive for them to continue dumping treasuries. I believe that this is the exact reason why the dollar and the Dow have been held up by the Federal Reserve for so long. They cannot allow a major dollar depreciation until the SDR is established on the world market as a ready substitute.
A good sign that this process might accelerate would be in the event that China de-pegs the Yuan from the Dollar and allows it to appreciate in value. This would signal that China is moving away from the traditional export arrangement with the U.S. Talks of a Yuan appreciation are already hitting the MSM:
Investors in the U.S. will foolishly cheer a rise in the value of the Yuan, thinking that this will increase American exports to China. In reality, China will be preparing to dump the last of its U.S. bonds, and begin exports and imports with the new ASEAN trading bloc:
This new bloc has the potential to surpass profit margins in U.S. markets, especially in the face of extremely weak consumer activity in America. As the U.S. falters under sovereign debt pressure, China will be in prime standing with a ready supply of SDRs and an organized trading bloc to take up the slack of falling exports to the West.
Shock And Awe
The illusion of U.S. recovery seems to be paramount in the plan for Globalist centralization. Every scam imaginable has been fashioned to lure the public into a sense of false comfort. In my original observations on the economic collapse, I believed that we would likely see a “trigger” event in 2010, which would set off a “rolling breakdown” that would not fully climax for a few years. Now, I am not so sure. After examining the facts behind the implementation of SDRs as well as the potentially explosive situation in the treasury market, I believe that a “shock and awe” scenario is becoming more probable. The behavior of the Fed, along with that of the IMF seems to suggest that they are preparing for a focused collapse, peaking within weeks or months instead of years, and the most certain fall of the dollar.
As I think of it now, the advantages of a sudden financial flash flood are numerous. In a drawn out collapse, the Liberty Movement is given a tremendous time advantage, allowing us to double and redouble our membership while the public opinion of the Federal Reserve and the government in general would deteriorate. In a sudden breakdown, our time will be cut short, and the public will be distracted and fearful, desperate for an organized authority to offer any semblance of “order.” A slow collapse allows for the Liberty Movement to work peacefully within the system to build a third party capable of dethroning the current two party farce. A sudden collapse erases all political activity and opens the door to martial law and illegitimate government. And finally, a fast moving meltdown leaves a much stronger psychological impression; a catastrophic waking nightmare, instead of a slow grinding depression. A world government could never be brought about due to the “monotony” of a long slow economic burnout. Too many factors could present themselves in such an extended period that might interfere with the desired end result. Too many variables to calculate. In an abrupt collapse, the Globalists would need only to gage and influence the amount of fear in the populace to a sufficient boiling point then leap in with their intended solution to the problem; centralized global governance.
I feel that in either method, the Central Bankers will fail to reach their ultimate goal, but the prospect of a direct monetary break with limited warning does make the atmosphere much heavier. One can only prepare as much as possible mentally and emotionally, and keep his eyes wide open…
Belahan Dada Paris Hilton di Twitter.
Artis Hollywood Paris Hilton kembali bikin sensasi.foto hot belahan dadanya muncul di twitter.Beberapa hari lalu, Paris menulis di Twitternya kalau ia tengah berlibur bersama kekasihnya, Doug Reinhardt. Sejak mendarat di tempat liburan mereka di Meksiko, ia tak henti-hentinya mengupdate Twitternya.
Salah satu hal yang paling menarik, saat ia menaruh foto dirinya tengah memakai bikini. Namun yang tampak jelas di foto tersebut adalah belahan dada Paris. Foto itu memang hanya menunjukkan tubuh bagian atas dara berambut pirang
Christian democracy is socially conservative and economically liberal. There is a trade-off in using the term liberal. In the USA liberal means leftwing. Libertarians complain about this. In most of the world the left is social democratic. It is true that US liberals are neither libertarian nor social democratic. And yet they are far more close to the classical liberal tradition than they are to social democracy. Liberterians would strongly disagree with me, but I think a comparative study of the historical evolution of the US Democratic Party and the European social democratic parties would bear me out on this.
The model Christian Democratic party is German. The CDU established a social market economy, that preserved socially conservative patriarchy with the single-male breadwinner by using welfare state policies to ensure that a household only needed one laborer. The Social Democrats in the Nordic states actively encouraged women to enter the market using welfare policies. The US has what could be called a night watchmen welfare state. So by the very absence of welfare benefits, the US libertarian system achieves a similar result to the Nordic feminist policies, since it pushes women into the market. However since the 1980s, Neoliberalism has swept the globe and we have seen a return to 19th century American style capitalism everywhere. So understanding Tucker Max’s social liberalism, and economic conservatism is useful to understanding the entire world.
And yet his worldview is both socially liberal and conservative. Milton Friedman’s minarchist liberterianism generally encourages social liberalism. But Max also relies on traditionalists like Homer, Thucydides, Paul Johnson, and Thomas Sowell. He also favors the economic theory of law. And yet from his sociobiological sources from Matt Ridley, Dawkins, Sperm Wars, Pinker, Wright, Greene etc. he favors a rather conservative social order. I suppose his belief is that in a minarchist social darwinist liberterian state, the survival of the fittest will naturally create a conservative order in line with Herbert Spencer. From the 18th century with Hobbes vs Locke, the strong Leviathan state was traditionally associated with a pessimistic view of human nature, while the liberal state was associated with optimistic blank slatism. This has been reversed since the 1960s, with cruel human nature used to justify the night watchmen state. This is the marriage of libertarianism and sociobiology.
Max draws on positivist Chicago School economics as opposed to natural law Austrian school.
So on the surface Tucker Max is just a hard-partying frat boy PUA. But as his reading list shows there is an entire political program behind it. I suppose you could call it bioliberterianism. While not specifically mentioned, this marriage of darwinism and masculinity, is very much in line with Nietzche’s Superman. His master morality where strength is power. Nietzsche said that Napoleon was proof of women’s inferiority, since no woman could ever dream of reaching that level of greatness. The 20th century descendant of Nietzsche is Heidegger, and in their Fight Club existentialism, there is a desire to find some sort of real experience and existence through caveman masculinity.
Make no mistake about it, as of 2010, Bioliberterianism is the official ideaology of the USA, and through globalization of the world. Most Americans whatever their status in society have embraced Bioliberterianism. This includes both the NPR liberal left and the Fox News Christian Right. Few speak in as explicit terms as Roissy, Halfsigma, and Tucker Max, but ideas don’t have to be held on the sleeve.
Is Bioliberterianism the legitimate heir to Renaissance humanism, Protestant individualism, Enlightenment rationalism, civic republicanism, and classical philosophy?
Philosophy has broken down in the 21st century since we have reached the Roissyite Utopia. Continental philosophy has descended into post-modernism, post-structuralism, and deconstructionism. Anglo-American philosophy is entirely logical positivist, linguistic, analytic. Both essentially reduce philosophy to linguistics and the analysis of language. This is more clear in the Analytic tradition derived from Wittgenstein and Russell. But the hermeneutic textual readings of the Continentals is also basically based on questions of language.
One can also see Freud as the founder of the school that everything is REALLY about sex. People are to distracted by his Oedpial conflict literary theory, to see that he is the direct precursor of Roissyite bio-reductionism. Freud’s theory of human nature is entirely based on his reading of Darwin’s sexual selection. Watson and BF Skinner’s Radical Empiricism represented a revolt against Freudian psychology based on Pavlovian conditioning. Pinker’s sharp attack on blank slatism represents a sort of Neo-Freudianist theory of human nature. Freud was similar to Roissy in being Janus-faced about sexual liberation. On the one hand he considered it unhealthy to deny caveman sexuality, on the other hand he realized that all the achievements of civilization were based on suppressing this.
Alphas/Id, Betas/Ego, Omega/Superego.
Now Roissyism supposedly represents both the ideology of sexual liberation and an attack on it. It is primarily an advocate of sexuality, the conservative attack is just moonshine. It is part of individualism, which always claims outsider status even when it is on the throne. That is the nature of pluralism. Those in power, will always be the loudest critics.
Who doesn’t love Hello Kitty? That adorable Japanese cat with the red bow? Hello Kitty has invaded US territory in the form of fashion accessories such as purses, T-shirts, lunchboxes, bags, jewelry, wallets, stickers, posters. Even celebrities like Lady Gaga and Paris Hilton pay tribute to this famous kitty. This proves there is no age limit to being a Hello Kitty fan. And you can’t forget the many television, movies, and video games that have found their ways into homes everywhere. It’s almost unimaginable that a character with no mouth can speak loudly to so many American kids, teenagers and adults alike. With anime becoming more and more popular in recent years, Hello Kitty has become one of the most recognizable Japanese characters. Hello Kitty even has her own theme park, restaurants and is even on the side of an Airbus A330-200 airplane!!! Even with Japan getting hit hard with recent Toyota issues, at least they will always have Hello Kitty to pull them through those tough times.
And don’t forget about her twin sister, Mimmy. She’s cute too.
in the form of fashion accessories such as purses, T-shirts, lunchboxes, bags, jewelry, wallets, stickers, posters. Even celebrities like Lady Gaga and Paris Hilton pay tribute to this famous kitty. This proves there is no age limit to being a Hello Kitty fan. And you can’t forget the many television, movies, and video games that have found their ways into homes everywhere. It’s almost 
unimaginable that a character with no mouth can speak loudly to so many American kids, teenagers and adults alike. With anime becoming more and more popular in recent years, Hello Kitty has become one of the most recognizable Japanese characters. Hello Kitty even has her own theme park, restaurants and is even on the side of an Airbus A330-200 airplane!!! Even with Japan getting hit hard with recent Toyota issues, at least they will always have Hello Kitty to pull them through those tough times.